<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Security on THS</title>
    <link>/tags/security/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Security on THS</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>de-de</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:23:42 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/tags/security/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Zoom Endpoint-Security Considerations</title>
      <link>/posts/zoomzoo/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:23:42 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>/posts/zoomzoo/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;who-put-the-zoo-in-zoom&#34;&gt;Who put the &amp;quot;Zoo&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;Zoom&amp;quot;?&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What I keep hearing these days is:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;We/I do not use Zoom for confidential conversations.&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;    &lt;img class=&#34;article-image&#34; src=&#34;/posts/zoomzoo/01_fine.jpg&#34; alt=&#34;This is fine.&#34;&gt;&#xA;    &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;But what if someone does not only care about the confidentiality of a Zoom-session but also about the integrity of his or her own endpoint device? It&amp;rsquo;s not only the spoken word of a group within a Zoom session that is at stake – it is also the integrity and confidentiality of everything a conference participant has stored on their computer.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
